Trademark Filing in 10 Easy Steps

Want to know how to do Trademark Filing in 10 Easy Steps?

Then click here ...Get Trademark Filing in 10 Easy Steps

Protecting Trademark Licensee’s Right to Continued Use of Trademark When Licensor Declares Bankruptcy

Originally published 6 July 2010

Keywords: Exide Technologies, trademark, intellectual property, bankruptcy, EnerSys Delaware Inc., executory contract,

In the case of In re: Exide Technologies, decided on June 1, 2010, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed two lower court decisions and held that a 1991 agreement between Exide Technologies and EnerSys Delaware Inc., which included a license to EnerSys for use of the “EXIDE” trademark, is not an executory contract that can be rejected by Exide in bankruptcy proceedings. The Third Circuit held that it was not an executory contract because EnerSys had substantially performed the agreement and did not have any unperformed material obligations that would excuse Exide from performance….

 
 

This confirms the value of trademarks, even after bankruptcy. Trademarks are valuable intangible assets which are recognised in law and in the courts. Use them to your advantage. Patrick

Posted via email from trademarkfiling’s posterous

Share

Whiskas Purple to become registered trademark

Mars Australia has been given the go-ahead by the Federal Court to register Whiskas Purple as a trademark for cat food, after rival Nestlé withdrew its earlier opposition. For more information (external link)

————————————

This raises the issue for your business, are you considering color in your trademark filing?  For many brands, color is an important and distinguishing feature.  For some of your brands, you may want to include color.  Patrick

Share

BlackBerry Drive trademark filing

Research In Motion recently filed a trademark application for “Blackberry Drive“,  more information (external link)

Share

4 Things to Consider When Your Trademark Application is Refused

You applied for your Trademark Registration months ago.

You then started to build your brand or business around this mark. You thought everything was alright until one day, months ater filing for the mark, you receive a letter from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (hereinafter “USPTO”) informing you that your Trademark Application has been refused based upon a likelihood of confusion with another mark.

Angry and confused you cannot understand why the refusal was issued. Your mark is not identical to the one blocking the registration thereof. How could this be? Concern grows to panic as you begin to ponder the costs associated with moving away from this mark and selecting and entirely new one – one which you can protect and maintain rights in. Before you do so, however, take heart – you may yet get your trademark registered. Go to this article for more… (external link)

Share

Trademark Filing Basics - Part 4: Basis for Filing and Specimens

basis for trademark filingBasis for Filing

The application should include your “basis” for filing. Most U.S. applicants base their application on their current use of the mark in commerce, or their intent to use their mark in commerce in the future.

Use in Commerce

For the purpose of obtaining federal registration, “commerce” means all commerce that the U.S. Congress may lawfully regulate; for example, interstate commerce or commerce between the U.S. and another country. “Use in commerce” must be a bona fide use of the mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not use simply made to reserve rights in the mark. Generally, acceptable use is as follows:

  • For goods: the mark must appear on the goods, the container for the goods, or displays associated with the goods, and the goods must be sold or transported in commerce.
  • For services: the mark must be used or displayed in the sale or advertising of the services and the services must be rendered in commerce.

If you have already started using the mark in commerce, you may file based on that use. A “use” based application must include a sworn statement (usually in the form of a declaration) that the mark is in use in commerce, listing the date of first use of the mark anywhere and the date of first use of the mark in commerce. A properly worded declaration is included in the USPTO standard application form. The applicant or a person authorized to sign on behalf of the applicant must sign the statement. The application should include a specimen showing use of the mark in commerce.

Intent to Use

If you have not yet used the mark, but plan to do so in the future, you may file based on a good faith or bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce. You do not have to use the mark before you file your application.

An “intent to use” application must include a sworn statement (usually in the form of a declaration) that you have a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce. A properly worded declaration is included in the USPTO standard application form. The applicant or a person authorized to sign on behalf of the applicant must sign the statement.

NOTE: If you file based on intent to use, you must begin actual use of the mark in commerce before the USPTO will register the mark; that is, after filing an application based on “intent to use,” you must later file another form (“Allegation of Use”) to establish that use has begun. See “Additional Requirements for ‘Intent to Use’ Applications” for more information.

International Agreements

Although not as common, you may base your application on international agreements. Under certain international agreements, if you qualify, you may file in the U.S. based on a foreign application or on a registration in your country of origin.

Also, section 66(a) of the Trademark Act permits the holder of an international registration to file a request for extension of protection of the international registration to the United States under the Madrid Protocol.

Continue reading Trademark Filing Basics – Part 4: Basis for Filing and Specimens

Share